| Re: [eclipsecon-na-program-committee] Finished voting |
|
For one, I have no idea who the speaker is and there’s no bio linked to the talk. And what percentage of the community uses JRebel? With so many talks that
are about actual Eclipse content, it’s hard to say I want this talk. As an example
J. Doug. From: eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Sven Efftinge I wonder why this talk has been voted down: It looks good to me. Sven On Nov 21, 2011, at 10:09 PM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:
Excellent. Thanks, everyone! I think quite a few of us have finished our first pass. I just double checked with Ian and we have 63 more talks to select (2 are reserved for the executive director choices). Looking at the top 60 or so vote getters,
we have a pretty good program already. We’ll need to go through and make sure everything is balanced but we’re off to a good start. We also need to talk a look at the Tutorial situation. We need to make sure we’re in good shape there and may need additional recruitment. At the end of Tues, I’ll send in what I see the top 63. It’ll be important to see what’s left and make sure we don’t miss anything. I’ll also report on the
distribution relative to our allocation. We’ll need to make adjustments there too. Feel free to tweak your votes as we go. And gather a list of talks you think are getting under voted so we can discuss. Reminder the next meeting on Wed and we can discuss where we are. Cheers, Doug. From: eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipsecon-na-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Arthorne Just a quick note to say I've finished voting on all 423 talk proposals (minus Agile/OSGiDevCon and my own talks). Now comes the realization that 2 out of every three submissions
will have to be rejected! There's lots of great content here though and I think it's already shaping up to be a great conference. _______________________________________________ |