There weren't any buckets but people were asked to vote online. The buckets work much better. On Nov 11, 2011, at 3:13 PM, John Arthorne wrote: Very interesting, thanks Ian. I noticed
in general far less total votes compared to EclipseCon/NA. Is the conference
that much smaller, or perhaps the talk voting buckets weren't as obvious?
There are definitely quite a few repeated talk proposals so this is valuable
feedback.
All,
Attached is a spreadsheet that contains the feedback for each session from
ECE. This is not a public document so please do not distribute. However,
I thought it might be useful to this PC when selecting sessions and speakers
for EclispeCon NA.
btw, unfortunately the data is in a different database and drupal instance
so it was not easy to provide you an online version. I am hoping
the spreadsheet will still be useful.
Ian
--
Ian Skerrett
VP of Marketing and Ecosystem
Eclipse Foundation
Tel: 613-224-9461 ext 227
Blog: ianskerrett.wordpress.com
Twitter: IanSkerrett[attachment
"speaker feedback.ods" deleted by John Arthorne/Ottawa/IBM] _______________________________________________
eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list
eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
_______________________________________________ eclipsecon-na-program-committee mailing list eclipsecon-na-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipsecon-na-program-committee
|