So it's now the "Eclipse Classic IDE release train 2018-12"?
So much for the brevity of "Eclipse Simrel 2018-12".
-1, since we'll have to deal with "what do you mean by 'Classic'?" questions, and because Coke Classic was introduced to recover from a terrible marketing snafu. Do we REALLY want to remind people of New Coke? Are we implying that failing to name the train something with a Q after Photon was an equally bad marketing decision, but we're not actually introducing a better name, just pragmatically differentiating from the other trains which don't release quarterly?
This feels about as creative as calling the web server httpd to differentiate it from the Apache Foundation.
TL;DR, I think we can do better.
Nick
Ed, Alex and I had
a meeting with the Eclipse Foundation folks at Eclipse Con Europe. We came
to an agreement that our release train can use "Eclipse IDE".
We can use this in splash screens, landing pages and everywhere where the
scope is clear. The Eclipse Foundation can use another name where the scope
is not clear, e.g. downloads page, main page, marketing, etc. Most likely
they will use "Eclipse Classic IDE", but that is not yet nailed
in stone.
In our Planning Council face-to-face meeting at EclipseCon Europe everyone
approved that,
Please vote on our release train name until November 5. We assume silent
consensus.
Dani
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
--
Nick Boldt
Principal Software Engineer, RHCSA
Productization Lead :: JBoss Tools & Dev Studio
IM: @nickboldt / @nboldt / http://nick.divbyzero.com
“The Only Thing That Is Constant Is Change” - Heraclitus