|Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] [eclipse.org-architecture-council] The "Eclipse Projects" Market|
Maybe the C++ one is a better example. We have a tonne of optional features for the CDT that aren¹t included in the C++ package. We need to find a better way to present these to users and the Marketplace is a great option. Doug. On 2015-05-01, 4:42 PM, "Marcel Bruch" <marcel.bruch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >I¹ve no opinion or proposals yet but I¹ve some trouble to contrast this >approach with the existing EPP packages and (elsewhere discussed) >Oomph-based standard profiles. > >More concrete: >Can you elaborate how, for instance, the Java Developer Tools Feature on >the Marketplace will be different to EPP Java package? >Bug 459905 sounds like this. Thus, I¹m missing the key motivation for >this step. I assume that you are looking for a greater flexibility than >we have today with EPP. Is this the main motivation? >Will EPP packages disappear some time soon? > >Thanks, >Marcel >_______________________________________________ >eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list >eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx >https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council > >IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to >the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you >must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
Back to the top