+1
Achim On 31.01.2012, at 15:37, Markus Knauer wrote: +1
Thanks, Markus
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 15:26, Marcel Bruch <bruch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Planning Council,
we, Code Recommenders, requested an exception for M4 (not M5) by sending the request to the Technology PMC in 2011/12/13. Unfortunately, this request got lost in the holidays rush. I've now been asked to request the exception directly at this planning council. The complete conversation about the exception request is archived here: http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/technology-pmc/msg03967.html
Since there has been no veto by PMC: Hereby I request an after-the-fact exception for Code Recommenders for M4 back in December. I'm glad to say that all relevant issues have been solved for M5 and all necessary pieces are in place. There is no further exception requested.
Please let me know if there is anything else I can provide.
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
_______________________________________________ eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal. |