[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
[eclipse.org-planning-council] One exception to the signing requirement ...
|
I wanted to bring your attention to one jar that can not be signed, for
technical reasons ... at least I think it's reasonable to classify that
way. See
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=277331
It's unfortunate situation, but the point of this post is to give you, the
Planning Council, a chance to review and voice your disagreement or
objections, about granting an exception. After all, our agreement with
each other was
"Projects must use signed plugins using the Eclipse certificate.
Exceptions must be authorized by the planning council for technical
reasons."
and I didn't want to be a bossy so-and-so forcing my decision on granting
an exception on everyone else (if I did, I'm sure Oliver would set me
straight :) .
I don't think we need to document agreements, in this case, but please do
comment in the bug or voice your objections if you have one.
Thanks,