Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [] Submitted EMF 2.4M3 to Ganymede

+1 for the table, and having everyone interested watch the page.   I think that we should do what we can to maintain a good signal to noise ratio with the cross projects channels, and having mail go to everyone is noisy.


On a related note, I would like to better understand of which messages to send to cross-projects-issues and which to in order to avoid feeling a tinge of guilt whenever I reply all to both.  Should we be sending notification/build/status messages and questions like this just to -dev, or do they need to go to both lists?





From: [] On Behalf Of Nick Boldt
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 8:25 PM
To: eclipse. org-planning-council; Cross project issues
Subject: [] Submitted EMF 2.4M3 to Ganymede


EMF 2.4.0M3 has been submitted.

Does anyone/everyone like the idea of using a signoff table like this one [1] for Ganymede Milestones?


I proposed that idea for Europa Winter Maintenance on Oct 2, and as yet haven't heard any objections. As M4 is the cutoff for Ganymede participation, that would be the logical date to start such signoffs, if not right now for M3.

Any +1s? If so I'll create a wiki page like the Europa one and send around the link.


On Nov 6, 2007 2:16 PM, Doug Schaefer < DSchaefer@xxxxxxx > wrote:

CDT has submitted our first CDT 5 build to Ganymede as well.


Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead,

From: [] On Behalf Of Kim Moir
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 2:13 PM
Subject: [] Submitted 3.4M3 to Ganymede


I've updated our Ganymede submission to reflect 3.4M3.


_______________________________________________ mailing list


Back to the top