Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev]Re-spin process

+1 for the continuously updated distribution proposal.  Especially for the maintenance (3rd digit) stream...
 
Wenfeng

Second, my opinions:
Personally I like the approach where Europa is a just a name and the
content is a moving target representing the latest and greatest versions of
the 21 projects that initially contributed until Ganymede ships. Of course
it is harder for developers to know which versions of a plug-in someone was
using, but the benefits for the community seems to be pretty high, and it
also means that we regularly re-spin putting a higher burden on the
coordinator. 
I like this approach a lot - it matches well with the ease of distribution that the internet provides us.
 
 
 

Back to the top