Re: Fw: [eclipse.org-planning-council] M5+2 Sunday build #2 (SUCCESS)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: Fw: [eclipse.org-planning-council] M5+2 Sunday build #2 (SUCCESS)

From: Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:32:02 -0800
Delivered-to: eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council>
List-help: <mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council>, <mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council>, <mailto:eclipse.org-planning-council-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eclipse Foundation Inc.
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)

Hmm, ok, so my ignorance of Pack200 is showing - do you know how I candetect whether a jar is pack200'd (my scheme of "the repacker packs thejar rather than skipping it" doesn't seem to be correct. Anyone?


Sorin Stoian wrote:

Bjorn,

The funny thing is we actually pack the features too :)).
Mmmm ... any thoughts on that ?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fw: [eclipse.org-planning-council] M5+2 Sunday build #2 (SUCCESS)
  - From: Thomas Hallgren

References:
- Re: Fw: [eclipse.org-planning-council] M5+2 Sunday build #2 (SUCCESS)
  - From: Sorin Stoian

Prev by Date: Re: Fw: [eclipse.org-planning-council] M5+2 Sunday build #2 (SUCCESS)
Next by Date: Re: Fw: [eclipse.org-planning-council] M5+2 Sunday build #2 (SUCCESS)
Previous by thread: Re: Fw: [eclipse.org-planning-council] M5+2 Sunday build #2 (SUCCESS)
Next by thread: Re: Fw: [eclipse.org-planning-council] M5+2 Sunday build #2 (SUCCESS)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs