Re: [eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders] Friends of Eclipse Enhancement Progr

["Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hmm, since https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=506244 is more
about discussing + legal than any coding, I’m not sure if it’s a good match for FEEP…

In the end, we’d only transfer the Bugzilla-discussion to a feep-stakeholder discussion
about WHAT we want to get done. So feels like we’re back to square 1. Or do you
have good reasons why you think the open discussion of stakeholders on Bugzilla
is stalled, and how FEEP could help here ?

Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner – Development Tools, Wind River
direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6
 

On 22/11/16 19:37, "eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Mickael Istria" <eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of mistria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    Hi all,
    
    I've also added https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=506244 . 
    If we're lucky, it will be done before FEEP assignment even starts, but 
    it's it's not, it's worth spending some FEEP making sure it's working.
    Note that it would also automatically make 
    https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=482236 and other issues 
    about JRE on Mac way less important.
    _______________________________________________
    eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders mailing list
    eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders@xxxxxxxxxxx
    To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
    https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders