Re: [eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders] a FEEP tag on bugzilla (rather than

[Mikaël Barbero <mikael@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I don't really know the whole history behind the [FEEP] prefix, but it has been mostly used by the AC. I will make the request for a new "feep" keyword and make the change to existing bugs.

Le 21 nov. 2016 à 11:56, Daniel Megert <daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

+1 for a new keyword. AFAIK a tag would not work, since it is owned by a concrete person (who can share the query on his tag if he wants).

Dani



From:        Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:        eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:        21.11.2016 11:47
Subject:        [eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders] a FEEP tag on bugzilla (rather than        header in description)
Sent by:        eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Hi,

I see most bugs for FEEP have [FEEP] in their subject. Why not simply use some bugzilla tags and keywords to deal with FEEP candidates and selection? When receiving an notification about a bug, whether it's FEEP or not is not really what one cares about.

Cheers,

--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer for Red Hat Developers
My blog - My Tweets_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders mailing list
eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders mailing list
eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-feep-stakeholders