Hi Christian/All:
Sorry, I am between two travels, so here is just short first feedback: First of all I wanted to thank Anne, Ralph and their team for the great logistical support they have provided. Our OSGi program team will have a post mortem in two weeks due to former business trips, but the overall impression was good .
Here is some information on our OSGi sessions that I've already shared with Ralph on last Thursday:
We had a good attendance - in peak times up to 80 attendees, in general between 30 and 50. The talk with the lowest attendance was a "business" talk and just got 22 attendees. However, it was interesting to see that the prior talk as well as the following one draw back the attendees; so people were interested in attending technical presentations as well as presentations about commercial products based on OSGi. We also got very good feedback by a bigger number of attendees who said that they sometimes switched between Eclipse and OSGi talks because of personal interest. Also the OSGi BoF was very well attended despite the ongoing party upstairs. People were really engaging in discussions on how to move ahead and several of us OSGi board members were approached afterwards to further discuss issues being raised. As a downside there were some minor logistical problems at the beginning (finding the FMZ) and also the internet connection was sometimes not at its best, plus we had one presenter who didn't show up (which was superbly handled by the moderator at this time, Mike Francis, who searched for and found Neill Bartlett to present another talk instead; and this talk was well received). However, despite these problems, all in all it was a very good event from our side and I was asked by various attendees whether we could co-locate again next year. Even on my way back an Eclipse attendee hooked up with me and said that this combination was excellent and he was able to pick from both events.
I agree that we need more time between the sessions to really be able to move and to not interrupt sessions that already started (happened various times, while I was moderating). I also think that, apart from some talks that really needed a full hour, most talks could live with ca. 30 minutes. Please note, though, that some people didn't want to submit for a "short talk" because of paying 50% of the entrance fee. I therefore would like to suggest to give each presenter a free ticket, but not the co-presenter(s).
Last but not least, the circus and the band were both fun (my own opinion), although people didn't mingle much during these times - thanks for organizing both, Ralph and Anne!
More feedback will be given once we will have had the OSGi CE post mortem.
Best, Susan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Susan Schwarze Director Standards, ProSyst Software Board Member & VP Marketing, OSGi Alliance ( osgi.org) ProSyst Software GmbH D-50931 Cologne, Germany, Aachener Str. 222 Tel. +49 (0)221 6604 411 · Fax +49 (0)221 6604 660 · Mobile: +49 163 6604 411 http://www.prosyst.com · s.schwarze@xxxxxxxxxxx
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- stay in touch with your product. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ProSyst Software GmbH Managing Directors: Thomas Hott, Daniel Schellhoss, Dr. Dimitar Valtchev HRB 54586, AG Köln, Tax No.: 223/5816/4275, VAT No. (UST-Id-Nr.): DE 814172407
Hi PC
I think ECE 2012 went quit ok also thanks to the work we all together put into create the program.
I do a quick list of things that could be better. I encourage everyone to post their own feedback.
Extended Talks: I changed my mind abouzt extended talks. Talks I went to could have also been presented as standard talk I must admit (except my own talk :-) ). I am interested to hear what the impression of other PC members is. But maybe we only do one length of talk next year ?
Closing a talk: I attended multiple session where people did not finish on time. In one extended talk, people where looking on the presentation time rather than the clock. One guy also started yet another demo at 0:30. Also two people complained to me, that their previous talk did not finish in time. People simply didnt get that they had to finish 5 minutes BEFORE the next speaker. Some people suggested to me that the FOSLC people should interupt the speaker (or show yellow or red cards). I presonally think that this would be too much. I had the idea of alarm clocks in every room (started by the FOSLC people) and they would automatically go off when the time is up. Other ideas are welcome (someone blowing a wuwuzela on the hallway or maybe there is a central loudspeaker that you could hear in every room). Speakers (or at least some speakers) wouldnt stop by themselves and I think it would be great if we can improve there.
Theatre: The place that I thought was really the best place for a good talk turned out to suck great time. Again several people complained to me. They couldnt see anyone, (lights right in their eye) and the crowd would just distribute over the whole place. So 100 people look like an empty crowd. I think we should close the back entrance for talks (not for keynotes) so that people move into the front half. And maybe we can also do something about the light. Currently it was a bad spot even for great speakers.
- it was really hard for me to anticipate how many people go to a talk. Most talks I went to had like 30 –50 (at most) people. I was really wondering where everybody is. (maybe again that is because I didnt went to modeling or DSL talks :-) ). Sarah Goff-Dupont who has like 3rd from the cut line on the bottom of the list of the proposed session, attracted about 60-70 people (people lining up on the wall) to see here Continous Integration Talk. We werent so sure about here because she is a product marketing person but she is a great speaker (and singer :-) ) and her talk was great.
- The Eclipse 4 tutorial was packed. I have never seen the Stage room so full of people. There was literally no seat. However it seems that it was quit some work to get two proposals together into one tutorial. (give that different people have different points of view :-) )
- I liked the three keynotes. As Ralph said, they all could improve. Some more and some less. The third one was apparently the best and I think it was quit good to put them on the last day
- when I distributed the talks on the slots, I put talks with high votings in the central place (rather than the FMZ) and also rather one Tuesday, Wednesday. Not sure if that was a good idea. Seems that the program faded a little out on thursday afternoon. Some people were sitting there just waiting for the closing session or they left early. Some apparently had to leave early because of a flight or a customer waiting. So maybe not that bad.
- we had a surprising high number of talk cancellations. Is that something we should formalize more like having a wait queue ?
As I wrote, please contribute your own feedback….
thanks
christian ------------------------------------------------------------- compeople AG Untermainanlage 8 60329 Frankfurt/Main Vorstand: Jürgen Wiesmaier Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Christian Glanz
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt/Main Handelsregister Frankfurt HRB 56759 USt-IdNr. DE207665352 -------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxxhttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
|