| [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Reconsidering Talks discussion |
Hi,
this is where we are now....
People suggest to have a limit per company and per speaker for accepted talks no matter how good they are. I went through the work of making a list of the most obvious suspects. I would hope more people from the PC get involved in the discussion:
- Whether you agree at all on cutting a upper limit of talks
- Or just use the average no matter what company
- Which one to reduce or cut
- Which talks you like to add instead
I need you to get involved in this discussion. Discussion that is happening now doesnt need to be done on Monday in the call.
Thank you
For Itemis we have (9!! talks)
GEF4 - Share and Enjoy... http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/862 average 8,43
Seven Languages For The JVM http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/888 average 8,43
Why Model When You Can Just Program? http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/981 average 8,14
Web Development with GWT and Xtend http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/791 average 7,57
Java Performance MythBusters http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/963 average 7,43
Null-Safety on Steroids http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/1019 average 7,43
Xtext - Best Practices http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/790 average 7,00
Systems Engineering with the Eclipse Requirements Modeling Framework http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/938 average 6,86 (one of two speakers is Itemis)
Massively Reducing the Effort to Test Xtext Languages http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/988 average 6,14
For Obeo we have (8 talks)
Polarsys: the open industrial revolution of Embedded Systems development http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/889 average 7,86
It's 2012 and your documentation sucks http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/926 average 7,71
EMFCompare 2.0 : Scaling to Millions http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/982 average 7,29
Buildroot Eclipse Bundle : A powerful IDE for Embedded Linux developers http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/895 average 7,14
Beyond Mylyn, leverage the data of your IDE http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/891 average 6,86
15 EMF projects in 25 minutes http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/975 average 6,86
Chocolate Based Development http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/894 average 6,00
Build your own System Engineering workbench http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/992 average 6,00
For Sebastian we have
Java Performance MythBusters http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/963 average 7,43
Null-Safety on Steroids http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/1019 average 7,43
Xtext - Best Practices http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/790 average 7,00
For Christian (myself) we have
Desktop apps on tablet devices http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/890 average 7,86
Why is OSGi dynamic ? http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/801 average 7,14
Riena on Eclipse 4 http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/809 average 7,13
Other talks mentioned
Jnario - BDD for Java http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/792 average 8,63
Now that I've Got a Model - Where's My Application? http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/1010 average 7,75
Talks that we could possibly add are:
from Ralph:
Eclipse Tool Qualification Requirements http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/870 average 5,75
Anatomy of an M2M Application http://www.eclipsecon.org/europe2012/node/1012 average 2,86
Obvious candidates (just below the line):
Is every talk below the red line. Obvious candidates are the top ones below the red line.
Reduction options so far:
We have recovered a standard talk slot which was simply incorrect data in the table thanks to Martin....
Martin mention to reduce “Desktop apps....” “Jnario....” “Now that I’ve Got a Model...” from extended to standard and reject one talk from itemis and one from Sebastian.
Christian (myself) offered to give away “Why is OSGi dynamic ?” “
Cedric offered to give away “Chocolate Based Development”
Thanks
christian