Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [] (Hopefully) Last action items

:-) I think this is not necessary. We should only give some reasoning for the rejected talks. For the others it's optional


2011/9/9 Simon Kaufmann <simon.kfm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, Achim. I just added a few comments to those accepted talks I felt most unfomfortable with. With that, I have to head off now. 

@Bernd: From my point of view that should do it. If you think every talk should have a comment, could you then please add some meaningless "sounds interesting, deliver a good talk" comment? That'd be great. I probably will be able to get online on Monday shortly, so I can see if there is something left I can help with.


2011/9/9 Achim Lörke <Achim.Loerke@xxxxxxxxx>

I've added a comment to all the rejected talks I initially reviewed and Simon didn't already handle and on some of the accepted talks. I didn't bother to put a comment on proposals from PC members and their corona ;-)

While adding comments I noticed that there are still older PC comments. If I remember right these should have been removed. I took the liberty to delete a few PC comments which seemed no longer needed.

Oh and by the way: is there a coupon code for PC members who would like to attend ECE? (Accounting made me ask).


On 07.09.2011, at 00:51, Bernd Kolb wrote:

> Hi,
> Please remember to put your comments into the submission system until Friday afternoon. I added a col AC left of the original comment col. Please remember to put your name there if you added a comment to a talk. Most important are the talks we reject. Please also keep in mind to add comments to the talks which you think could get improved in one form or another.
> Thx
> Bernd
> _______________________________________________
> mailing list

_______________________________________________ mailing list

_______________________________________________ mailing list

Back to the top