RE: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] RE: We'd like to withdraw

["Donald Smith" <donald.smith@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Don't we have wayyyyyyy to many talks with GEF and GMF already?

If we accept 1279, it will have to overlap with this talk:
http://www.eclipsecon.org/2010/sessions?id=1419

On the surface, it doesn't look like a problem to me -- but I just want to
check with the PC.

Any objections to 1419 (replacing 1349) -- please speak before 2pm Eastern
today.

 - Don


-----Original Message-----
From: Content-filter at foundation.eclipse.org
[mailto:postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ketan Padegaonkar
Sent: February 11, 2010 11:06 AM
To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] RE: We'd like to
withdraw our talk for EclipseCon 2010 - Talk EC 1349

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Oisin Hurley <oisin.hurley@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> https://www.eclipsecon.org/submissions/2010/view_talk.php?id=1279
>
> "Use a bot to test your GEF and GMF based applications"

+1. This was one of the few shortlisted talks that did not get in
because of err... my tutorial.

-- Ketan
studios.thoughtworks.com | twitter.com/ketanpkr
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-comm
ittee