Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Tutorials Suggestion

[Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>]

+1 And actually given the crunch, I'd propose we make all tutorials 120 minutes and open up more talk slots. I'm thinking with all the things going on at Eclipse as represented by all the submissions we got, making EclipseCon more of a sampler than a place to spend a 3 hour tutorial at might be worth considering.

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Donald Smith <donald.smith@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

 

Looking at all the tutorials:

http://tr.im/JCex

 

I would suggest that we look at the tutorials as a group, and not try to get caught up in the “extended 180” versus “Regular 120” distinction at this point.  I.e., I would have all the accepted tutorials assume they have 120 minutes only – and a lucky 5 we determine later will get the extra hour on Monday AM.

 

BTW – Looking at the tutorial (only, as a group) submissions, I notice 1425 as an example of a tutorial that goes out of it’s way to show off Eclipse as an end-to-end solution.  It pulls in Jetty, EclipseLInk, Equinox on the RT side, and Dali, PDE and WTP on the Tools side showing an end-to-ender.  My worry is that it’s an example of the kind of submission that can get lost if we get locked into the various silos.  Just throwing it out there.

 

-          Don

 

Come to EclipseCon -- March 22-25 http://eclipsecon.org/

Donald Smith

Director of Ecosystem Development

Eclipse Foundation, Inc.

P:+1 613 224 9461 x231

C:+1 613 292 5160

F:+1 212 918 1619

 

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee