Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Updated Committer and Co

[David Carver <d_a_carver@xxxxxxxxx>]

The only talk I think that was marked as fitting better in CI and Build, 
but actually in my opinion covers much more Project management/community 
relations aspects is my talk, 1079 on Scrum, XP, and Eclipse.

Reasoning is that it follows pretty closely to Wayne's talk about the 
Eclipse Development process, and the concepts of the talk are really 
project Management focused, with some aspects of build and ci falling in 
due to the agile concepts.

Anyways, just thought I'd clarify.

Dave

Wayne Beaton wrote:
> I'll take another pass in a few minutes.
>
> I'm making serious headway with the Java talks.
>
> FWIW, I'm trying to compare each entry with the various other 
> spreadsheets. If it looks like a talk has either been accepted in 
> another category, or I feel that it simply belongs there, I'm defering 
> to that category. I do already see a lot of overlap.
>
> "Java" is another one of those tags (like "Emerging Technology") that 
> everybody seems to think applies to their talk. IMHO, only about 1/4 
> of the proposals I've reviewed so far actually are really "about Java".
>
> Wayne
>
> Oisin Hurley wrote:
> > > I think that 1274, Eclipse vs. IntelliJ for plugin developers,  
> > > belongs in
> > > Committer and Contributor. Though, to be honest, I'm leaning toward
> > > rejecting the talk.
> > >     
> >
> > I'm ok with leaving in there, Wayne - what do you think of the other
> > items? If you agree, go ahead and strike them out on the spreadsheet.
> >
> >  --oh
> > _______________________________________________
> > eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
> > eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee 
> >
> >