Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] EclipseCon 2009scheduling M1

I'll go with a strong "Good".
 
Something that struck me looking at a real program, the main stage talks look so good, I'm not sure I can pull myself away to see the other talks. I wonder if that's just me...
 
Doug.


From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 12:21 PM
To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] EclipseCon 2009scheduling M1

Good Great job Bjorn, you rock!

However, I don't see the short talks scheduled in the Other category.

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Here's a alpha (or, in Eclipse parlance, an M1) of the EclipseCon 2009 schedule.
I'm happy to accept feedback in one of the following forms:
  • Good Great job Bjorn, you rock!
  • Pretty-good As PC member for category X, please reorder my category's talks A and B
  • Reasonable As PC member for category X, please schedule my newly accepted long/curated talk A into the blank spot at day Y, time Z.
  • Not-so-good As PC member for category X, I want you to exchange my talk A with somebody else's talk B. The PC member for talk B (category Y) agrees with this swap.
  • Bad Talks A and B on day X, time Y have the same speaker
I tried to keep categories sequential and definitely without horizontal conflicts. Other than that, oof, it's a hard task.
- Bjorn






--
[end of message]

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee




--
Cheers,

~ Chris Aniszczyk

Back to the top