[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
[eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Win an Aardvark
|
All,
I know you are all hard at work getting
your categories in order. It looks like there are some good
negotiations going on to get the submitters to work together and make
their talks more concise.
In case you are wondering how many un-allocated talks are available
here is the list:
- 10 Tutorial Slots
- 12 Long Slots
- 1 Main Stage Presentation
On Tuesday's call next week I want to have
an
Aardvark bake-off. Each of you will pitch the talks that you can't fit
into your allocation that you think should be in the program
(aardvarks). My hope is to distributed the un-allocated talks either
on the call or shortly after (email voting).

In order to make this work, we need to have
finished our category reviews. This means
that you should go through your category and:
- Tentative-Accept the talks you can fit given your current allocation
- Tag your Main Stage (if you have one)
- Tentative-Decline talks that we should not consider
- Tag talks that you think are good, but you can't fit as Aardvark
There is not a lot of un-allocated time to
spread between all of the categories so be prepared for some serious horse
aardvark trading.
For this to work we need to be ready. As an incentive, I will give
one long talk to the first category that is ready for the Aardvark sale.
If your category is ready, send an email to the mailing list, I will
review and let you know if you have won. There is a little fine print
at the end of the post that explains the rules a bit more.
I realize that I am being a bit of a dictator here. If you have a
problem with that blame Doug Schaefer, I read his dictator
post last week.
Scott
PROGRAM RULES:
over-submitted
1) This only applies to the categories that
are significantly over-submitted (see below). Data Tooling, Reporting,
e4, CDT, and Committer And Contrib can not win this one slot. We still
want you to participate in the call on Tuesday, so please make sure you
are prepared.
2) No cheating. You can't just accept a bunch of talks, mark the rest
as aardvarks and call it good.
3) Your category can be over-booked if you have a valid plan to reduce
longs to shorts etc. I am not looking for perfection just a clear
idea that your work is done. If it is confusing explain it in your
email (great job to everyone who provided status for the last call).
4) Rules Subject to Change if this poorly thought out idea causes more
problems than it solves.
Business And Industry |
755% |
over-submitted
|
OSGi DevCon |
659% |
over-submitted |
Modeling |
473% |
over-submitted |
Tools |
471% |
over-submitted |
Mobile And Embedded |
364% |
over-submitted |
Runtime |
349% |
over-submitted |
Other |
327% |
over-submitted |
Test And Performance |
228% |
over-submitted |
UI / RCP |
200% |
over-submitted |
Emerging Technology |
196% |
over-submitted |
SOA |
178% |
over-submitted |
Java |
173% |
over-submitted |
Web Tools |
161% |
over-submitted |
Data Tooling |
117% |
not eligible
|
Reporting |
108% |
not eligible |
e4 |
101% |
not eligible |
CDT |
100% |
not eligible |
Committer
And Contributor |
99% |
not eligible |
|
Attachment:
SelectionProgress2.xls
Description: MS-Excel spreadsheet