[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Area-Of-Interest Decals
|
Isn't it your job to keep reality out, Bjorn? :-)
Fair enough about the price, but I'd like to understand the selection
standard, and hope that it is better than "make a lot of noise of the
mailing list."
Regards,
John Graham
Eclipse Data Tools Platform PMC Chair
Staff Software Engineer, Sybase, Inc.
http://dataplat.blogspot.com/
Bjorn
Freeman-Benson
<bjorn.freeman-be To
nson@xxxxxxxxxxx> Eclipsecon Program Committee list
Sent by: <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-com
eclipse.org-eclip mittee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
secon-program-com cc
mittee-bounces@ec
lipse.org Subject
Re:
[eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-com
12/20/2007 10:59 mittee] Area-Of-Interest Decals
AM
Please respond to
Eclipsecon
Program Committee
list
<eclipse.org-ecli
psecon-program-co
mmittee@eclipse.o
rg>
Because reality intrudes: the page of labels is not big enough to have a
label for each category.
Of course, we could buy bigger pages, but that's more $$$, etc.
jograham@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I suggest that having one area-of-interest tag for each EC track
makes
sense. If these areas are important enough to warrant a track, then
why do
only a subset get these decals?
--
[end of message] _______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
