From:
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Darin Swanson
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 5:40 PM
To: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Instructions
fortomorrow
As indicated in
my synopsis, I have a tutorial that we would like to run over 2 slots:
65 - API
design workshop, Boris Bokowski et al, IBM
https://eclipsecon.greenmeetingsystems.com/submissions/view/65
Should we break
this up into part 1 and part 2 or is this an implementation detail I should not
worry about
Thanks
Darins
|
"Gaff,
Doug" <doug.gaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by:
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
12/06/2007
02:28 PM
|
Please respond to
Eclipsecon Program Committee list
<eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"Eclipsecon
Program Committee list"
<eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
[eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee]
Instructions for tomorrow
|
|
Hi Program
Committee,
I need to
apologize for some confusion around the “Wait List” state. This is really
intended to be a replacement for Bubble. As you know, we are the guinea
pigs for this new system, and we’re modifying the process on the fly.
For
tomorrow, please get as many talks as possible into 1 of the 3 states: Accepted,
Declined, Waitlist. Please convert your Bubble talks to waitlist. We will
discuss anything in New or Waitlist, and given the current count, tomorrow will
be a long call. Tomorrow is also the time for horse trading, so if you
want to trade someone else longs for tutorials, make sure you’re ready to bring
it up.
Below is the
current status. I humbly apologize for the table. I whipped it up
quickly.
Accept-Decline-Waitlist-New
(Allocated)
|
Category
|
Long Talk
|
Short Talk
|
Tutorial
|
%
|
|
Business
|
5-8-0-5 (5)
|
2-0-0-0 (5)
|
0-0-0-0 (0)
|
70.0%
|
|
C/C++
|
2-0-0-0 (2)
|
3-1-0-0 (5)
|
3-0-0-0 (3)
|
80.0%
|
|
Data
Tooling
|
3-0-0-1 (3)
|
1-0-0-0 (5)
|
3-1-0-0 (3)
|
63.6%
|
|
Director's
Choice
|
0-0-0-1 (2)
|
0-0-0-0 (0)
|
0-0-0-0 (0)
|
0.0%
|
|
Emerging
Technologies
|
5-7-2-1 (5)
|
11-0-2-4 (20)
|
3-4-0-0 (3)
|
67.9%
|
|
Industry
Vertical
|
1-2-0-3 (2)
|
3-0-0-0 (10)
|
0-0-0-0 (0)
|
33.3%
|
|
Java
|
3-1-0-3 (4)
|
5-2-0-0 (5)
|
2-1-0-1 (3)
|
83.3%
|
|
Mobile
and Embedded
|
3-5-4-0 (4)
|
9-0-2-0 (10)
|
3-0-0-0 (3)
|
88.2%
|
|
Modeling
|
5-0-0-13 (5)
|
10-0-0-10 (10)
|
8-0-0-10 (8)
|
100.0%
|
|
Committer
and Contributor
|
3-3-1-3 (4)
|
5-2-0-0 (5)
|
2-0-0-0 (3)
|
83.3%
|
|
OSGi
DevCon
|
4-10-7-1 (4)
|
0-0-0-11 (10)
|
2-4-3-0 (6)
|
30.0%
|
|
Other
|
2-4-0-3 (2)
|
3-0-0-5 (5)
|
2-4-0-1 (0)
|
100.0%
|
|
Eclipse
as a Platform
|
4-5-0-4 (4)
|
7-0-0-0 (10)
|
5-1-0-3 (9)
|
69.6%
|
|
Rich
Client Platform
|
2-15-0-4 (4)
|
6-3-0-9 (10)
|
9-1-0-8 (9)
|
73.9%
|
|
Reporting
|
4-1-0-0 (4)
|
5-0-0-0 (5)
|
3-0-0-0 (3)
|
100.0%
|
|
SOA
|
4-2-0-2 (4)
|
5-2-0-2 (5)
|
3-0-0-0 (3)
|
100.0%
|
|
Test
and Performance
|
3-1-0-10 (4)
|
3-0-0-0 (10)
|
1-0-0-5 (6)
|
35.0%
|
|
Tools
|
0-0-0-23 (4)
|
0-0-0-9 (10)
|
0-0-0-8 (3)
|
0.0%
|
|
Web
Tools
|
4-4-4-1 (5)
|
6-1-3-1 (10)
|
8-1-0-0 (9)
|
75.0%
|
|
Accepted
vs. Allocated Slots
|
57 / 71
|
84 / 150
|
57 / 74
|
67.1%
|
|
|
80.3%
|
56.0%
|
77.0%
|
|
|
Submissions
vs. Total Slots
|
221 / 80
|
153 / 160
|
113 / 80
|
152.2%
|
|
|
276.3%
|
95.6%
|
141.3%
|
|
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee
