| Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Long Talk and Panel final roundup |
Rich wrote on 01/07/2007 04:41:43 PM:
> As we’re already past our deadline and soon need to start reviewing
> short talks and demos, I plan to do the following in order to finish
> up our long talk & panel selections and schedule rooms (speak now if
> you object, or better, resolve your tracks asap :)
>
> Panels:
> 1. Reclaim the panel slots from C++, Reporting, RCP, and Tools, as
> they have no submissions.
In RCP we are still trying to come up with a panel that touches on aspects of the talks that could not be accepted.
> 2. Allocate one to Fundamentals and accept both of its submissions -
> 3757: What sucks about Eclipse (2 PC votes, 1 community vote) &
> 3891: How we learned to stop worrying and love Eclipse UA (1 PC
> vote, 16 community votes)
> 3. Accept OSGi panel 3900: What does the future hold for OSGi? (2 PC
> votes, 4 community votes)
I believe that Peter has been working on creating an OSGi panel from some rejected talks...
> 4. Accept Web panel 3747: What does Eclipse need to do to become the
> IDE for AJAX?
> 5. Decline the rest. This gives us 10 panels overall, and frees up
> some space we may need on Thursday due to a potential room conflict.
>
> Long Talks:
> 1. In the Java track, accept 3650: The fine art of reverse
> engineering (3 PC votes, 1 community vote) & 3825: Threads, java.
> util.concurrent and Eclipse Jobs: problems and solutions (1 PC vote,
> 2 community votes).
> 2. In the OSGi track, accept 3705: Using OSGi back-end system for
> the purpose of enterprise management of Eclipse IDEs
It would be great if we could rustle up an additional slot for OSGi. There is lots of stuff to talk about and currently only 3 slots including the extra one mentioned here.
> 3. In the RCP track, accept 3628: Rich client platforms: Eclipse RCP
> compared with NetBeans Platform (2 PC votes, 13 community votes);
> 3816: How to make your RCP application NOT look like Eclipse (1 PC
> vote, 4 community votes)
The RCP track subcommittee is still reviewing and debating. We'll resolve in the next couple days.
> 4. In the SOA track, accept 3882: STP Components (2 PC votes); 3887:
> From modeling to execution in the enterprise – using BPMN and BPEL
> (2 PC votes)
> 5. In the Web track, accept 3869: XML Development Tools in Eclipse
> WTP and beyond (1 PC vote, 1 community vote)
> 6. Decline the rest. This gives us 67 with another one (or two)
> coming to Mike’s Director’s Choice track
Jeff
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee