[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re[2]: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Long Talk & Panel update
|
Nope, that does NOT help! :-)
Ok, let me rephrase it, I am fine calling it an OSGi slot but then I
STILL could use an extra slot, some of the papers are really to too
cool to not hear ...
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
DS> I am going to accept:
DS> http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3815
DS> So, you can technically consider that an OSGi talk (Equinox) as well? I.e.,
DS> I'll give you one of the Industry vertical slots but you need to use it for
DS> 3815 :)
DS> Does that help the OSGi side of things?
DS> - Don
DS> -----Original Message-----
DS> From: eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
DS> [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
DS> Behalf Of Peter Kriens
DS> Sent: December 22, 2006 3:36 AM
DS> To: Richard Gronback
DS> Cc: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
DS> Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Long Talk & Panel
DS> update
DS> I really could use an extra long slot, I have 15 long talks from which
DS> there are 6 highly interesting in my opinion. Unfortunately I have
DS> only 2 slots ... One slot is for server side OSGi, the other for
DS> "embedded OSGi", but I'd like a slot of advanced/out of the ordinary
DS> OSGi.
DS> Any change? Who do I have to buy a beer? :-)
DS> Kind regards,
DS> Peter Kriens
RG>>
RG>> Hi All,
RG>>
RG>> It would be great to wrap up the majority of selections before
RG>> the holidays, so if you?re certain about those you?d like to mark
RG>> as ACCEPTED and DECLINED, now?s the time. As mentioned before,
RG>> this should make it much easier to decide on reallocations.
RG>>
RG>> Don?t forget to about the declines (as tough as it may be),
RG>> though leave your hopefuls set to NEW in case you receive more slots.
RG>>
RG>> Here?s where we?re at (allocated/accepted/submitted/declined):
RG>>
RG>> Track Long Talk Panel Comment
RG>> Business 4/0/17/0 1/0/1/0
RG>> C++ 2/2/5/3 1/0/0/0 Talks set
RG>> Data 3/3/3/0 1/1/1/0 A perfect score! ;)
RG>> Fundamentals 4/0/15/0 0/0/1/0 A panel in need of a slot
RG>> Industry 2/0/3/0 1/0/1/0
RG>> Java 4/0/11/0 1/0/2/0
RG>> Mashup 2/0/8/0 1/0/1/0
RG>> Mobile 5/4/6/0 1/0/1/0 Almost set
RG>> Modeling 5/0/13/0 1/0/1/0 Ready to ACCEPT, discussion posted
RG>> OSGi 2/0/15/0 1/0/2/0
RG>> Reporting 5/0/10/0 1/0/0/0 Ready to ACCEPT, discussion posted
RG>> RCP 4/0/21/0 1/0/0/0
RG>> SOA 2/0/5/0 1/0/1/0
RG>> Technology 6/6/25/19 1/0/3/0 Just need panel decision
RG>> Test 4/4/12/8 1/0/1/0 Just need panel decision
RG>> Tools 4/0/7/0 1/0/0/0
RG>> Web 5/4/16/1 1/1/2/0 Almost set
RG>>
RG>> Recall there are 3 extra slots, and that we should be
RG>> considering the overall program (more PC votes on ?foreign? tracks would
DS> be great!).
RG>>
RG>> Thanks!
RG>> - Rich
RG>> --
RG>> Richard C. Gronback
RG>> Borland Software Corporation
RG>> richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
RG>> +1 860 227 9215
RG>>
RG>>
--
Peter Kriens Tel +33467542167
9C, Avenue St. Drézéry AOL,Yahoo: pkriens
34160 Beaulieu, France ICQ 255570717
Skype pkriens Fax +1 8153772599
