Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Christmas is coming...the

[Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Title: Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Christmas is coming...the Program's getting fat

Thanks, Doug.

I’m not sure about votes on accepted talks, as there were some accepted in WebTools when I went through the list that would have felt odd to vote on after the fact.  I guess it’s OK either way.

FWIW, the Modeling PMC discussed our submissions and put our thoughts in our minutes: http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Modeling_PMC_Meeting%2C_2006-12-19

Best,
Rich


On 12/19/06 2:48 PM, "Gaff, Doug" <doug.gaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Sorry for my holiday bias…it made the best rhyme.
 
I just finished reviewing all (most) of the submissions. I skipped a couple of the finished tracks as well as areas that might expose my incompetence.  J

Meta comment: I didn’t see a lot of PC votes. That’s not surprising. There weren’t a lot last year, since most of the decisions were made on the phone.  This year, we’re pretty track-focused, which might make the problem worse.  Rich & Bjorn: as a matter of procedure, should there be PC votes on accepted tracks?
 
General comment: I hope we can get some “user” talks into the track content.  I didn’t see a lot of votes on user talks, e.g. “I used RCP too do XXX”.
 
Peter Kriens:  There are two similar proposals from folks from bandxi: one in embedded/mobile and one in OSGi.  See this comment <http://eclipsezilla.eclipsecon.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3814#c6> . I’ve asked for clarification.  Do you know anything about these talks?
 
Doug
 

---

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee mailing list
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee

-- 
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215