Re: Re[2]: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] tutorial deadline

[Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

If you believe some changes to the title and/or description will help
attendees understand what it's about, you should definitely work with the
submitter to improve it.

For another (unnamed) conference this year, the program committee managed to
completely rewrite my title and abstract without consulting me, which I
didn't think was such a good idea. ;)

Best,
Rich


On 11/14/06 11:51 AM, "Peter Kriens" <Peter.Kriens@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I just went through the list of tutorials and did my votes. Some
> remarks.
> 
> Many titles use names and abbreviations that require insider
> knowledge. I think it is worth the effort to go through the titles
> to clean up those names and abbreviations and let the title clear what
> problem is being addressed.
> 
> I was late to the game, what should I do next? Do I accept the
> tutorials I like or is there a more PC oriented process?
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
>      Peter Kriens
>      
> RG>
> RG>  
> RG> Great, thanks Chris (and Jeff, and Bjorn).  Hopefully,  others
> RG> will find the time today to cast their votes (we'd like to have
> RG> more  "external" votes in the Modeling track, right Ed? ;)
> RG>  
> RG>  
> RG>  
> RG> Best,
> RG>  
> RG> Rich
> 
> RG>  
> RG>  
> 
> RG>  From:
> RG> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> RG> [mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk
> RG> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 11:31  PM
> RG> To: Eclipsecon Program Committee list
> RG> Subject: Re:  [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] tutorial deadline
> 
> RG>  
> RG>  
> RG> I chimed in with my votes, I suggest people do the same soon
> RG> otherwise it  will look like we aren't caring enough (for people like
> Wassim that is  ;p)
> 
> RG> Cheers,
> 
> RG> ---
> RG> Chris Aniszczyk | IBM Lotus | Eclipse Committer  | +1 860 839 2465
> 
> RG> Jeff  McAffer ---11/13/2006 08:49:22 PM---The tutorial acceptance
> RG> deadline is on Wed I  believe. Have people been voting using the
> RG> PC voting mechanism? Many of the  subm
> 
> RG>  
> RG>       From:  Jeff McAffer        <Jeff_McAffer@xxxxxxxxxx>    To:
> RG> Eclipsecon Program Committee list
> RG> <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx>    Date:
> RG> 11/13/2006 08:49 PM    Subject:
> RG> [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee]        tutorial deadline
> 
> RG>  
> 
> 
> RG> The tutorial acceptance deadline is on Wed I believe. Have people
> RG> been voting using the PC voting mechanism? Many of the submissions
> RG> I've been  looking at have either no votes, my votes or Richard's
> RG> votes. If I understand  correctly, we are free to (and
> RG> encouraged?) to vote on submissions in all  tracks. Is that
> RG> accurate? What are other people doing?
> 
> RG> I guess I'd like to see more of what everyone else thinks and is
> RG> choosing. Without that it feels like we are creating 18 parallel
> conferences.
> 
> RG> Jeff  _______________________________________________
> RG> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee  mailing  list
> RG> eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx
> RG> 
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-commit
> tee
> 
> 
> RG>   

-- 
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215