| [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] Long talk #204 is not available |
|
Good thing I checked. Nick Edgar has politely DECLINED to present
#204.
:-P
Paul VanderLei
Embedded Java Enablement Team
1750 Ridgemoor SE
Grand Rapids, MI 49506
616.975.1985
pvlei@xxxxxxxxxx
"I don't see architecture coming from you." -Jerry Seinfeld
Tuesday, January 31, 2006 9:46 AM To: "Eclipsecon Program Committee list" <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx> cc: From: "Tim Wagner" <twagner@xxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] long talk vote That’s a majority.
Paul, would you call Nick and check? If he can do it, let’s go with that (and
let me know so I can begin the admin work with From:
eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul M Vanderlei Looks like the voting
is a landslide, which makes me ask.....Has anyone double-checked with Nick that
he is still willing to do this talk? I would be willing to do that today, once
Tim declares that 204 is in fact the
selection. Paul
VanderLei Embedded Java Enablement
Team 1750 Ridgemoor
SE 616.975.1985 pvlei@xxxxxxxxxx "I don't see architecture
coming from you." -Jerry Seinfeld Tuesday, January 31,
2006 1:57 AM I’ve heard only support for 40 and
204, so let’s confine it to those two. Maher,Gunnar, MikeT, and Paul have
“pre-voted” for 204 and I’m assume Sri is voting for
40. Would others please let me know
their preference, and I’ll declare the result
Tuesday. As a reminder, 40 was the next on
our short list; 204 was a high priority RCP track recommendation that we missed
due to some miscommunication about the original track preferences. If you feel
reconsidering 204 is invalid given our voting process, then simply vote for
40. |