| Re: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] long talk vote |
|
Looks like the voting is a landslide, which makes me ask.....Has anyone
double-checked with Nick that he is still willing to do this talk? I would be
willing to do that today, once Tim declares that 204 is in fact the
selection.
Paul VanderLei
Embedded Java Enablement Team
1750 Ridgemoor SE
Grand Rapids, MI 49506
616.975.1985
pvlei@xxxxxxxxxx
"I don't see architecture coming from you." -Jerry Seinfeld
Tuesday, January 31, 2006 1:57 AM To: "Eclipsecon Program Committee list" <eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee@xxxxxxxxxxx> cc: From: "Tim Wagner" <twagner@xxxxxxx> Subject: [eclipse.org-eclipsecon-program-committee] long talk vote I’ve heard only support for 40 and
204, so let’s confine it to those two. Maher,Gunnar, MikeT, and Paul have
“pre-voted” for 204 and I’m assume Sri is voting for
40. Would others please let me know
their preference, and I’ll declare the result
Tuesday. As a reminder, 40 was the next on
our short list; 204 was a high priority RCP track recommendation that we missed
due to some miscommunication about the original track preferences. If you feel
reconsidering 204 is invalid given our voting process, then simply vote for
40. |