[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[eclipse.org-architecture-council] Revising EDP to be uptodate with the *actual* allowed process rather than the original one
- From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" <manderse@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 08:17:54 +0200
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
I would like to raise to the architecture council the issue of the
documented eclipse development process are not uptodate - causing
projects to think things are unnecessary complex. Due to this I've seen
that resulting in projects just never going out of incubation
or me and others having to spend ungodly amount of time explaining
things aren't as bad as it seems. In either case - its not good.
One specific area the current documented EDP is getting in the way
rather than helping is for projects that would like to do actual
releases with a much higher cadence than the original EDP was ever
intended for. We are talking weeks sometime days between
releases rather than the traditional several months between a releases.
I asked Gorkem to outline the concerns in context of Che to
but was then made aware that the right place to see this change happen
is at the arch council.
This thread is to start understanding how we can best move this forward.