Hi all,
I'm in the same boat; sorry to miss the meeting.
On the topic of Eclipse build infrastructure, I'd note that the
webmaster team has been fairly responsive to requests regarding
LocationTech HIPP / Nexus concerns. Overall, that is working ok.
Currently, GeoMesa is using the public Travis CI servers for GitHub
commits and PRs. Those builds are slow; having dedicated Eclipse
hardware would be awesome.
As a big stretch, having a cloud which would be used for integration
tests would be nice, but that's likely too big an ask.
For Docker builds, would all the software included have to pass the
Eclipse IP guidelines? It seems like some of the pieces of a
standard Linux distribution in a Docker might be GPL. If we can
have that in a Docker image, I'd like to ship a Docker with
GeoServer in it...
Cheers,
Jim
On 08/11/2016 12:39 PM, Martin Lippert
wrote:
Hey!
Same here, sorry for missing the call.
Cheers,
Martin
Everyone,
I apologize that I missed the meeting. My
schedule got jumbled up. I will review the notes.
Jay
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
|
