Oops :-)
https://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/development_process_2014/index.php
https://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/development_process_2015/index.php
I've had difficulty getting good HTML diffs, so I'm very interested
to see what you come up with.
Wayne
On 13/10/15 04:31 AM, Daniel Megert
wrote:
> You need to read
all of the words :-)
You too! :-)
"I know there is a link that
allows
to see the changes. But what I'm looking for is a simple text
compare showing
only the changes, so that I do not have to go over the whole
document.
If you don't have that., links to the old and new document would
allow
me to do the text comparison myself."
Dani
From:
Wayne Beaton
<wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:
13.10.2015 05:08
Subject:
Re:
[eclipse.org-architecture-council]
Fw: Draft of Eclipse Development Process 2015 for your review
Sent by:
eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
You need to read all of the words :-)
There is a link to a "diff" on the main document. I'm not all
that happy with how it renders, but it should at least point you
to the
changes.
There's a link on the right labeled "Changes made since the
previous
version of this document"
https://www.eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/development_process_2015/diff.php
HTH,
Wayne
On 12/10/15 01:01 PM, Daniel Megert wrote:
Hi Wayne
Sorry, this might have been unclear. I know there is a link that
allows
to see the changes. But what I'm looking for is a simple text
compare showing
only the changes, so that I do not have to go over the whole
document.
If you don't have that., links to the old and new document would
allow
me to do the comparison myself.
Dani
----- Forwarded by Daniel Megert/Zurich/IBM on 12.10.2015 18:56
-----
From: Daniel
Megert/Zurich/IBM
To: "eclipse.org-architecture-council"
<eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12.10.2015
18:41
Subject: Re:
[eclipse.org-architecture-council] Draft of Eclipse Development
Process 2015 for your review
Hi Wayne
Sorry for the late response. I was busy with other stuff.
For a serious review I would like to see a diff between the
current EDP
and the proposed one. Can you provide that?
Dani
From: Wayne
Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "eclipse.org-architecture-council"
<eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 01.10.2015
00:23
Subject: [eclipse.org-architecture-council]
Draft
of Eclipse Development Process 2015 for
your review
Sent by: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Greetings Architecture Council.
I've completed a draft of the update to the Eclipse Development
Process
for 2015 [1].
I'll admit that I had to scale back my ambition on this, but I
think that
it does provide some valuable incremental improvements. The list
of bugs
that track the changes are listed at the bottom of the document.
I've also
provided a direct link [2].
There is a link to a "diff" on the main document. I'm not all
that happy with how it renders, but it should at least point you
to the
changes.
The more significant changes are these:
415620: [EDP] Streamline review requirements
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=415620
I think that this makes reviews better, though it is really just
an acknowledgment
of practices that we've been following for some time. Hopefully
it will
at least make reviews seem less scary.
471367: [EDP] Include "Freedom of Action" requirement in the
EDP
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=471367
This probably the only new requirement in this draft. It
effectively says
that projects are required to use EF-provided Git and download
servers.
477238: [EDP] Generalize the expected output of projects
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=477238
I tried to make the document more inclusive of things that
aren't necessarily
frameworks and tools. This is probably where I need the most
help from
you to ensure that the changes that I made are right and that I
didn't
miss anything. Of course, we can't change the quote from the
bylaws.
I would very much like to bring this to the board for their
approval this
quarter which, I believe, means that we need to provide it to
them for
review by mid-October.
Your attention is appreciated.
Thanks,
Wayne
[1] http://eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/development_process_2015
[2] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?f1=blocked&j_top=OR&known_name=Revise%20the%20EDP%202015&list_id=12686367&o1=equals&o2=equals&query_based_on=Revise%20the%20EDP%202015&query_format=advanced&v1=463857&v2=463857
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
[attachment "attvs5t6.png" deleted by Daniel
Megert/Zurich/IBM]
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes
internal to
the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this
list,
you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
to request removal.
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes
internal to
the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this
list,
you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx
to request removal.
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
[attachment
"ECE Friends 130x100_0.png" deleted by Daniel
Megert/Zurich/IBM]
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes
internal to
the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this
list,
you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
|
