Sorry
I am late on the task, I need to drive to work after the conf call.
Following is my input to the components and layers...
A.
Components to be reused in both desktop/designer environment and web/deployment
environment:
- OSGi
- EMF
- DTP/Model, DTP/Connectivity/ODA
- BIRT/model, BIRT/report engine/chart
engine
- WTP/XML and WS runtime components, WTP/wst-server, WTP/jst-server
components
- TPTP/agents ...
B. Components to be reused in desktop/designer
environment.
- SWT
- JSF
- Help
- Update
- RCP
- VE
- Workbench
- GEF
C. Tools to be integrated in various designer
applications (such as Java IDE, C/C++ IDE, Embedded App IDE, Web App IDE, Report
IDE, test and performance IDE, Database admin tool,
etc..)
- ANT
- JDT
- Debug
- CDT
- WTP/JSP, _javascript_, HTML, XML editors. WTP/app
server adaptors.
- DTP/SQL editor/query
builder
- BIRT/Reprot designer, Chart
builder.
- PDE
- Team framework
Possible Dependency: C --> B -->
A
Started at 11 PST, with a couple of interruptions by
people knocking on the door. This is my 50 min.
input.
Wenfeng
(It was sooo tempting to return to my
email or to make phone calls, but I said I'd do this so here it
is...)
Major Eclipse Platform components:
- OSGi plug-in loader
- Ant
- Update
- Resource model including IWorkspace and IProject
- Workbench User Interface including menus, editors, views, wizards,
etc.
- JDT Compiler and in-memory model
- JDT User Interface (editors, views, wizards, debugger, etc)
- Debug Framework
- Team Framework including compare/difference engine and user
interface
- CVS Team Tools
- PDE
- Widgets (SWT and JFace)
- Help System
We can use an automated tool to determine what the
dependencies between the these components are. I'm playing around with Lattix for this purpose. It doesn't
break up as cleanly as I would like (the upper diagonal numbers are
dependencies that violate my component structure):
 Part of my problem is that I started
from package names and the Platform has ui code mixed with core code under the
same high level package, e.g., org.eclipse.foo.internal.ui... and
org.eclipse.foo.internal... so I have to go through and separate out each of
the dependent pieces. I'm not complaining, I'm just stating that the
packaging naming does not exactly match my idea of how the components are laid
out.
Clearly there is a layout of the components that works or Eclipse
couldn't load, so perhaps I should start from the plug-ins rather than the
package names...
Anyway, my 30 minutes is up, so here's my
input... Bjorn
|