RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] What does your project useforUI-b

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Sounds good to me, as long as we don't
become "the test group" ... :) 
I'd like to see the demo/ect., but doubt
there should ever be a "single test strategy for Eclipse", so,
do not believe that's in our scope.

"Tim Wagner" <twagner@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

09/20/2005 11:02 PM

Please respond to
"eclipse.org-architecture-council"

To	"eclipse.org-architecture-council" <eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc	Ali Mehregani <amehrega@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject	RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] What does your project        useforUI-based testing?

Can we put this on the December
agenda?

---

From: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Harm Sluiman
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 5:15 AM
To: eclipse.org-architecture-council
Cc: Ali Mehregani
Subject: RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] What does your project
useforUI-based testing?
 

In TPTP we have tried several things, including Abbot for SWT, and the
Rational Function Tester. Abbot was too high maintenance, and RFT did not
leave us with openly reusable testcases.
We have since picked up a UI macro record playback tool from the PDE folks
and are enhancing it and integrating it into TPTP JUnit support. We are
hosting it just as a tool for now but expect it to become part of the project
deliverables. It has just exited an iteration and we are about to start
using it full tilt. 

I can arrange a demo for AG folks that are interested. This is part of
our "eat your own dog food" aka "self hosting" practice.
Usage will help stress the rest of the TPTP test frameworks.

Thanks for your time.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harm Sluiman, STSM,  
phone:905-413-4032   fax: 4920  
cell: 416-432-9754
mailto:sluiman@xxxxxxxxxx
Admin : Arlene Treanor atreanor@xxxxxxxxxx  Tie: 969-2323 1-905-413-2323

"Richard Gronback" <Richard.Gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

09/08/2005 07:58 AM

Please respond to
"eclipse.org-architecture-council"

To	"eclipse.org-architecture-council" <eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] What does your project use        forUI-based testing?

 

Borland also uses homegrown tools.  As I recall, Harm mentioned TPTP
was
looking into providing support for this?

- Rich

-----Original Message-----
From: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Tim Wagner
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 10:22 PM
To: eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] What does your project use
forUI-based testing?

Just taking a little informal poll - what does your project / member
company use to perform UI-based Eclipse testing?

W.r.t. BEA's Eclipse-based tools, we mostly rely on Abbott plus some
homegrown extensions. I'd like to vet the cost/benefit tradeoffs of that
approach against what others are doing.

Thanks,

-t


_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-counci
l
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council