Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipse-pmc] Please approve works-with dependency on XULRunner 17

+1.

McQ.

Inactive hide details for John Arthorne---2013/07/22 11:44:52---PMC members, The SWT team has submitted a CQ to document a depeJohn Arthorne---2013/07/22 11:44:52---PMC members, The SWT team has submitted a CQ to document a dependency on XUL Runner 17.

From: John Arthorne/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
To: eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Date: 2013/07/22 11:44
Subject: [eclipse-pmc] Please approve works-with dependency on XULRunner 17
Sent by: eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx





PMC members, 

The SWT team has submitted a CQ to document a dependency on XUL Runner 17. This is not a library we would distribute with Eclipse Platform or SWT. If the library is present, then SWT can optionally use the library in its Browser widget. As required by the Eclipse 3rd party library policy [2], the PMC must determine what kind of dependency this is, and record its decision in a public communication channel. I propose we record this as a "works-with" dependency. This exact case is in fact used as an example in the definition of "Works with" in the policy document. Please cast your vote here.
 

+1 from me
 


[1]
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7434 
[2]
http://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/Eclipse_Policy_and_Procedure_for_3rd_Party_Dependencies_Final.pdf_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc

GIF image


Back to the top