On 2010-03-17, at 2:51 AM, Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
+1 on the proposal. Great work!
Regarding Jeff's proposal, the wording "reship WebKitGTK"
is confusing. We are talking about a pre-req here. All we are going to ship is
Java +JNI code that's supposed to link dynamically to the WebKitGTK sharedlibs
which are expected to be pre-installed. Or did I miss the point
Yeah, I misworded. should have been "require" not "reship".
I agree that the answers to a/b/c could better relate to
the requirements a/b/c. Rather than in-lining with the requirements, it could
also work to re-phrase the req at the beginning of the answer, e.g. a) Pre-req:
I'm fine either way. Some of the readers will not know what the requirements are so restating each with our answer might be helpful. Not fussed.
Thanks guys for driving this. I agree it it important