RE: [eclipse-pmc] Branding Must Do for Galileo

["Walter Harley" <eclipse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

First I've heard of this, which probably means that's true for other component leads...

 

If it's really true that every individual bundle manifest must be updated, I hope that Someone (that ever-productive fellow) will come up with clear instructions for what the correct content should be, and either produce a separate Bugzilla for each component, or take charge of making sure that every component lead is cc'ed.  Mail to cross-platform-dev is probably not sufficient, experience shows.

 

Thanks,

  -walter  (JDT/APT)

 

---

From: eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 12:09 PM
To: eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx; cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [eclipse-pmc] Branding Must Do for Galileo

Hi Tom,

 

this makes sense, thanks for the update.

 

So is it still true that different provider names also mandate different icons?

Or is that no longer required due to recent changes to the about dialog?

 

Cheers,

--

Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River

Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member

http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm

 

 

---

From: eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas Watson
Sent: Mittwoch, 04. März 2009 21:02
To: eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx; cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [eclipse-pmc] Branding Must Do for Galileo

For the Equinox PMC we decided that it was not helpful to group brand all projects in RT with one "Eclipse RT Project" brand. Similar to the Tools and Technology projects we have a diverse set of projects that we did not want to force all projects in RT under a single brand. Note that https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=252813#c1 states that it is up to the project PMC to decide what to use for each project.

Tom



"Oberhuber, Martin" ---03/04/2009 01:50:32 PM---Hi Tom,

From:	"Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:	"Cross project issues" <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:	eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date:	03/04/2009 01:50 PM
Subject:	RE: [eclipse-pmc] Branding Must Do for Galileo

---

Hi Tom,

Given that all providers which have the same about dialog icon are collapsed to a single provider name on the about dialog, it is my understanding that "provider name" should be the same inside each "major project". That being said, I'd expect something like "Eclipse RT Project" for Equinox, along with an icon specific for RT.

But my information might be out of date... or, Equinox might just be in a differnet category since it's expected to be in each and every Eclipse installation anyways, so there's not so much extra information to be conveyed.

copying cross-project for wider discussion.

Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm

---

From: eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas Watson
Sent: Mittwoch, 04. März 2009 20:10
To: eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eclipse-pmc] Branding Must Do for Galileo

Eclipse PMC,

Please see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=252813#c1. The Branding must do (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=254312) requires that the provider for each feature and bundle be updated to something more specific than "Eclipse.org". For example, in Equinox we updated ours to be "Eclipse.org - Equinox". Does the Eclipse project need to update all there bundles to something other than "Eclipse.org" if so what? "Eclipse.org - Eclipse" seems redundant.

Tom
_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc