|Re: [ecf-dev] Remote service question|
On 10/20/2014 12:28 PM, Hallvard TrÃtteberg wrote:
Yes, this was what I was thinking of. The advantage is that the framework does a bit more for you, and you 'reuse' the async interface that you already defined for the caller.
Right.Â ÂIt may very well make sense to create a new/customized distribution provider to do this for you, and ECF's provider architecture makes this very natural (e.g. you could even very simply extend an existing provider).
If you decide it would be worth it to do this we can certainly continue technical/implementation discussion in those directions (new/extended distribution provider).Â ÂJust let me/all know.