Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ecf-dev] Speed of the different discovery providers

On 01/26/2011 06:41 PM, Martin Petzold wrote:
> Am 26.01.2011 15:01, schrieb Markus Alexander Kuppe:
>> how fast a new service gets
>> discovery/a gone service gets undiscovered
> I would like to optimize how fast a new service gets discovery/a gone
> service gets undiscovered in a subnet. Could zookeeper be somehow
> faster, even if SLP and JmDNS are more low level.

Zookeeper and SLP/JmDNS work quite differently. Where SLP/JmDNS use
multicast, Zookeeper uses a unicast connection. Thus Zookeeper will be
naturally faster (for small numbers of client), but it has the drawback
that it requires client configuration (IP of Zookeeper server).

Markus


Back to the top