Hi Franky,
I will try to comment further today (Thursday). I'm very occupied
these days, and haven't yet had a chance to go over your patches
carefully. I will try to do so this morning.
But in the mean time...thanks for your most excellent contribution
on this! It is most appreciated by me...and I believe the entire
community will benefit. It's a very important area, and I'm looking
forward to getting the contribution into ECF remote services.
Thanks,
Scott
On 10/7/2010 7:43 AM, Franky Bridelance wrote:
Hi,
Any comment on the proposed approaches for remote service
call authorization?
br,
Franky
2010/10/6 Franky Bridelance <franky.bugzilla@xxxxxxxxx>
Hi Markus,
I've attached two patches: patch_approach1.txt contains
the changes for the wrapper approach (first one described in
my email), patch_approach2.txt contains the changes for the
pre and post invocation hooks.
IMHO, I think second approach is better because the
implementation of the IRemoteServiceCallPolicy does not need
to perform the remote call.
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
|