[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ecf-dev] Reminder: ECF conf call TODAY (10/9) at noon pacific
- From: "Ted Kubaska" <ted.kubaska@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:40:06 -0700
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KDb1sMVmoToIZdwrs0YOGWV1J7SyNi/SXDiqjFudI6msbYY8HNWibJ+ffBeBlP9BSXL+tsAvtf7C/DYhLc/iLpn1y//nBt2b3QB8sgAzcXmYs9gKz3TCj883xB17bVGluF1G2/BUuXHcpllBfou40a1V1mFDXiqXXeFXp9sEw/k=
I'm hoping that I can set up quickly enough to be useful. I'm in the
process right now of trying to get my Eclipse/ECF environment
up-to-date. So I have the free time ... question is whether I can get
up-to-speed quickly enough to be useful. I think it'd take me the rest
of the morning (I'm Pacific time).
Realize that my ECF work has been with the auto build environment not
with the ECF code itself ... but I would like very much to also work
with the code and hoping this may be a good way to start.
For messaging I've been using Skype, but I'll see about getting Jabber up today.
On 10/10/07, Remy Chi Jian Suen <remy.suen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Actually, I'd suggest keeping things on the list so that if others are
> available they could also join in. If other people are available and
> Ted can't make it for whatever reason (in the event that Mustafa's
> free time doesn't align with Ted's).
> I also think that it'd be better if the code was committed to CVS even
> if it's a little unstable. The current code is a little tedious to
> setup and is not entirely usable since multicharacter operations
> aren't supported anyway, so I don't think it'd be too big of a deal if
> some "untested" code was committed to CVS.
> On 10/10/07, Mustafa K. Isik <isik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Ted,
> > On 10/9/07, Ted Kubaska <ted.kubaska@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > [...] Mustafa ... cola testing sounds like a possibility for me ...
> > > if I understand correctly what you mean.
> > I'll send you the untested code or make it available as a feature via
> > an update site.
> > We will start a cola shared editing session and compare / diff the
> > contents of our resulting documents for consistency.
> > I would also like to know whether you think that conflicting
> > modifications are resolved in an intuitive manner or not.
> > I suggest we take our thread off-list to determine a time that works
> > for us both.
> > You can reach me via either Jabber/XMPP IM:
> > codesurgeon@xxxxxxxxx
> > isik@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Thank you,
> > Mustafa
> > _______________________________________________
> > ecf-dev mailing list
> > ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
> ecf-dev mailing list