Hi Chris, 
 
Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
  sure, release 1.2 and then do the move review so the 2.0 work can
be in Tools to save the burden of doing it later.  
 
 
Right. 
 
  This would also give us an opportunity to reorganize CVS a bit. 
   
 
 
True.  I think the only thing holding that back (irrespective of tools
move) is bandwidth from Ted and myself for implied build changes, so if
others want/can contribute in that then please chime in. 
 
Scott 
 
   
Cheers, 
   
--- 
Chris Aniszczyk | IBM Lotus | Eclipse Committer | http://mea-bloga.blogspot.com
| +1.860.839.2465 
   
   Scott Lewis
---10/04/2007 10:07:13 AM---Hi Folks, Now that ECF is past 1.0, we can
move to the 'tools' group (with EMF, 
   
   
  
  
  
   
   
  Hi Folks, 
   
Now that ECF is past 1.0, we can move to the 'tools' group (with EMF,  
Mylyn, etc) and out of the 'technology' group if we prefer.  In fact,
we  
can do the associated review on Oct 18 along with the 1.2 release  
review...if we want to do this.  
   
What are other committers feelings about having the 'move review' on  
October 18 along with the 1.2 release review? 
   
Scott 
   
_______________________________________________ 
ecf-dev mailing list 
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx 
  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev 
   
   
  
 
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
   
 
 
 |