[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Hi Scott,
It is really not a pressing need so no worry. Also I was not thinking about
something fancy / automated, but simply something any committer can do once
the release is over. For example for the platform, Kim is usually doing it
a few days after the release when we all unwind.
Good luck with the review,
PaScaL
From: Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF) developer mailing list." <ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 09/19/2007 08:48 PM
Subject: Re: [ecf-dev] Retagging
Hi Pascal,
As has become usual, we're low on all things ECF (i.e. I do pretty much
everything...and have to split my time with a full time job), so
although I will try to do as you suggest, it might require some work on
build scripts that would take some time for me)...so regrettably I can't
promise it in the short term.
BTW, we are going to have to revoke 1.1 because the Foundation needs to
have us do a release review:
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/ecf-dev/msg01036.html
As you can probably tell, I'm a little irritated about it.
Scott
Pascal Rapicault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In order to make it easy for users to get the source of a precise
release,
> I would recommend you to tag each projects that went into an actual
release
> with a meaningful tag (for example R_1.0.0). Recently I had to get ECF
1.1
> and it was less than optimal, though not too painful.
>
> PaScaL
>
> _______________________________________________
> ecf-dev mailing list
> ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
>
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
