| Hi,are there any plans to support the following use case:
 I have an existing 3.x application running on compat layer. Now I
      want to add a new view using fragments, meaning I plug a new e4
      view into the model which was created by the compat layer?
 Currently this is not possible, because the model is not fully
      created when fragments or processors are merged.
 
 Regards
 Jonas
 
 Am 02.08.2013 16:19, schrieb Eric Moffatt:
 
 
      Wim, we've already started on
          at least part of if. I've just committed changes to the
          org.eclipse.ui.views extension point that allows someone using
          Eclipse 4 to declare a new view with its implementation being
          e4 style (DI...). This is the first test case; if it seems to
          be the correct direction we expect to do this for other
          extensions such as org.eclipse.ui.menus (e4 Handlers...).
 We also have ongoing work in
          progress that will alter how we integrate with the legacy 3.x
          API so that creation of any necessary 3.x artifacts
          (Workbench[Window, Page], IWorkbenchParts, ViewReferences,
          PartSites...) all get created 'automagically' during the
          rendering stage. Part of this will be to add the new life
          cycle events to allow this to happen. Once done your mixed
          model RCP app should be capable of consuming most (if not all)
          existing views / editors, even those that need access to
          EditorReferences...
 
 In fact we've just been
          discussing how we might override the default renderer factory
          so that we can supply ones specific to the IDE (so that they
          can create the necessary 3.x artifacts without introducing
          dependencies.
 
 Onwards,
 Eric
 
 
  Wim Jongman
          ---08/02/2013 08:28:12 AM---Hi, When we spoke on the e4/RCP
          BoF it was made clear that allowing the e4 
 
 
 
 
 Hi,
 
 When we spoke on the e4/RCP BoF it was
        made clear that allowing the e4 programming model on e3 was the
        first priority for Luna (or maybe that was what I wanted to
        hear?).
 
 On the plan [1] the first item on the
        list is the effort to use e4 in the e3 context. However, when I
        go to the milestone breakdown [2] all of these items are still
        on the unscheduled list.
 
 Is there already an idea what the
        current focus is for Luna?
 
 Thanks and best regards,
 
 Wim
 _______________________________________________
 e4-dev mailing list
 e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
 https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
 
 
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
 
 |