Re: [e4-dev] Naming convention question

[John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx>]

In an RCP context, I would say application
model makes sense. The term "Workbench" has tooling connotations
so doesn't make sense to me when describing a general RCP application.
We have been specifically working on a modeled implementation of our Eclipse
platform workbench, but that is just one of many possible applications
you can build with Eclipse 4. So maybe one way to compare the terms it
is that the modeled workbench is one particular example of an Eclipse 4
application model. Maybe I'm just making it even more confusing ;)

John

Lars Vogel <lars.vogel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

01/28/2012 07:22 PM

Please respond to
E4 Project developer mailing list <e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	E4 Project developer mailing list <e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [e4-dev] Naming convention question

No opinion? In this case I select option 2.)

2012/1/27 Lars Vogel <lars.vogel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hello,

I would like to have a consistent naming for my Eclipse
4 tutorial (and upcoming book). Therefore I would like to know if  how
we would like to call the model for Eclipse 4:

1.) The modeled workbench
2.) The application model

I personally like the the second term. I believe the project
started with 1.) but I think workbench is a technical term and I would
prefer to see 2.) in usage.

Any opinions?

Best regards, Lars

-- 
Lars
http://www.vogella.de
- Eclipse, Android and Java Tutorials
http://www.twitter.com/vogella
- Lars on Twitter



-- 
Lars
http://www.vogella.de
- Eclipse, Android and Java Tutorials
http://www.twitter.com/vogella
- Lars on Twitter_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev