[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [e4-dev] CSS + Modelled UI: Need notion of active part
|
It looks like the merge worked, I have released my changes (for bug 263533). I believe that the selection logic works now. Sometimes (in particular when the thumbnails are being refreshed) you have to be very patient to see the preview being upated. There is still work to do...
Oleg, the call to injectInto is temporarily gone, it will reappear tomorrow (hopefully - I have a couple of meetings).
Eric, how can we track clicks on the tab of a CTabFolder that don't result in selection changes? Right now, to activate a part, you have to click in it - clicking on the tab does nothing if it already is the selected tab in its stack. See StackModelFactory.hookControllerLogic.
Boris
Boris Bokowski/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
Boris Bokowski/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
02/03/2009 10:06 PM
Please respond to
E4 Project developer mailing list <e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
I have released Oleg's patch from bug 263544 which makes the selection logic work again, but not completely: selecting a thumbnail does not currently update the preview, but selecting a photo in the Libary view does.
I am working on a solution for this as part of bug 263533. Not sure if I will be able to merge all the conflicting changes tonight :-)
Boris
Kevin McGuire/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
Kevin McGuire/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
02/03/2009 09:34 PM
Please respond to
E4 Project developer mailing list <e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
You're right, I'm seeing the same thing. I've logged bug #263573 and Yves I've added you to CC.
Note also bug #263572.
Kevin
"Yves YANG" <yves.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
02/03/2009 07:23 PM
Please respond to
E4 Project developer mailing list <e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To | "'E4 Project developer mailing list'" <e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
cc | ![]() |
Subject | RE: [e4-dev] CSS + Modelled UI: Need notion of active part |
|
I just sync with CVS. I have a problem with e4 demo. When I select a project or an image, the image doesn’t show up, .
Yves YANG
Soyatec - Eclipse OutSourcing & XAML for java
http://www.soyatec.com
Tel: +33 1 60 13 06 67
Mobile: +33 6 20 74 39 45
Fax: +33 9 58 07 06 67
From: e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kevin McGuire
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 12:34 AM
To: E4 Project developer mailing list
Subject: RE: [e4-dev] CSS + Modelled UI: Need notion of active part
Excellent. I wish I could volunteer to help, but I'm not sure how I'm going to get done everything I've already committed to!
Kevin
"Yves YANG" <yves.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
02/03/2009 05:25 PM
Please respond to
E4 Project developer mailing list <e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To | "'E4 Project developer mailing list'" <e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
cc | ![]() |
Subject | RE: [e4-dev] CSS + Modelled UI: Need notion of active part |
|
>That'd be a great demo to see at EclipseCon, it's a good idea. Will you have time to work on such a demo?
Yes, I have started working on e4 photo demo.
Regards
yves
From: e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kevin McGuire
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 6:34 PM
To: E4 Project developer mailing list
Subject: RE: [e4-dev] CSS + Modelled UI: Need notion of active part
Hi Yves,
That'd be a great demo to see at EclipseCon, it's a good idea. Will you have time to work on such a demo?
I think the issues in the bug thread are orthogonal though, since it's about the relationship between semantics in the workbench model and any form of declarative styling (ie. I assume it's the exact same problem for XWT integration).
Regards,
Kevin
"Yves YANG" <yves.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
02/02/2009 09:55 PM
Please respond to
E4 Project developer mailing list <e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To | "'E4 Project developer mailing list'" <e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
cc | ![]() |
Subject | RE: [e4-dev] CSS + Modelled UI: Need notion of active part |
|
I think Declarative UI has more interaction with CSS. How about to start this integration with XWT + Modelled UI and prepare a nice demo together for EclipseCon?
Best regards
Yves YANG
Soyatec - Eclipse OutSourcing & XAML for java
http://www.soyatec.com
Tel: +33 1 60 13 06 67
Mobile: +33 6 20 74 39 45
Fax: +33 9 58 07 06 67
From: e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kevin McGuire
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 2:01 AM
To: e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [e4-dev] CSS + Modelled UI: Need notion of active part
Eric suggested I forward this thread to the list. I think it's an interesting problem because it's about meta information expressed at the level of the workbench (active part), manifest as styling via CSS (as changes in tab colors), and how we should communicate that.
Those interested should comment in the bug so we can keep the thread together.
Regards,
Kevin
----- Forwarded by Kevin McGuire/Ottawa/IBM on 02/02/2009 07:41 PM -----
bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
02/02/2009 03:47 PM |
To | Kevin McGuire/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA |
cc | ![]() |
Subject | [Bug 263185] [CSS] Need notion of active part |
|
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=263185
Product/Component: E4 / UI
--- Comment #2 from Eric Moffatt <emoffatt@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-02-02 15:47:51 -0400 ---
This makes perfect sense to me. We most certainly don't want the CSS to be
against the 'focus' control but, as you say, the 'active part' (as defined by
some higher level entity (aka the workbench)...
I'm all for having the Model/CSS boundary managed by a separate piece of code
(bundle?), specific to this task. We should have enough information being
forwarded by the model to accomplish this fairly cleanly. This will allow the
us to freely 'play' with concepts in this area without affecting the other
(non-CSS aware) parts of the code.
We should perhaps take some time to discuss this on 'eclipse-e4'...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You reported the bug._______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev





