Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [e4-dev] CSS + Modelled UI: Need notion of active part

I think Declarative UI has more interaction with CSS. How about to start this integration with XWT + Modelled UI and prepare a nice demo together for EclipseCon?


Best regards


Soyatec - Eclipse OutSourcing & XAML for java

Tel: +33 1 60 13 06 67

Mobile: +33 6 20 74 39 45

Fax: +33 9 58 07 06 67

From: e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kevin McGuire
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 2:01 AM
To: e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [e4-dev] CSS + Modelled UI: Need notion of active part


Eric suggested I forward this thread to the list.  I think it's an interesting problem because it's about meta information expressed at the level of the workbench (active part), manifest as styling via CSS (as changes in tab colors), and how we should communicate that.

Those interested should comment in the bug so we can keep the thread together.



----- Forwarded by Kevin McGuire/Ottawa/IBM on 02/02/2009 07:41 PM -----


02/02/2009 03:47 PM


Kevin McGuire/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA




[Bug 263185] [CSS] Need notion of active part

Product/Component: E4 / UI

--- Comment #2 from Eric Moffatt <emoffatt@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-02-02 15:47:51 -0400 ---

This makes perfect sense to me. We most certainly don't want the CSS to be
against the 'focus' control but, as you say, the 'active part' (as defined by
some higher level entity (aka the workbench)...

I'm all for having the Model/CSS boundary managed by a separate piece of code
(bundle?), specific to this task. We should have enough information being
forwarded by the model to accomplish this fairly cleanly. This will allow the
us to freely 'play' with concepts in this area without affecting the other
(non-CSS aware) parts of the code.

We should perhaps take some time to discuss this on 'eclipse-e4'...

Configure bugmail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You reported the bug.

Back to the top