RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] Inofficial TM 3.2RC1 posted for testing

I can see there are features tm.terminal.local and tm.terminal.sdk. And the feature tm.terminal.sdk includes the tm.termial feature I was looking for.
For all the other features unzipped from the RSE-runtime.zip file, I can see the correponsing ones listed in this website, but not the tm.terminal one. Is it working as designed?
(We don't ship the SDK feature in our product, but only the features in RSE-runtime.zip and the RSE-useractions.zip).

Thanks.,

Xuan Chen, Problem Determination Tools for IBM i
(905) 413-3769 T/L 313-3769
xuanchen@xxxxxxxxxx

"Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

21/05/2010 04:59 PM

Please respond to
Target Management developer discussions <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"Target Management developer discussions" <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] Inofficial TM 3.2RC1 posted for testing

Hi Xuan,

the site is valid, the tm.terminal.sdk feature is there. I see it when I direct my browser to the site, and it's the same qualifier as in the continuation of build log (attached).

I believe that the problem must be on your end, probably some issue with caching or mirroring. The ...signedUpdates site is re-built with a new build relatively often. It's not entirely impossible that some mirror still contains stale data, and that your p2 consumer thus doesn't accept it.

I'm not sure how I could best help you in this situation.

Thanks,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
direct +43.662.457915.85 fax +43.662.457915.6

From: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Xuan Chen
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 6:00 PM
To: Target Management developer discussions
Subject: RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] Inofficial TM 3.2RC1 posted for testing

Thanks for the information, Martin.

I compared today's I-Build:

http://download.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm/downloads/drops/I20100521-0702/index.php

with the features listed in the I-build update site:
http://download.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm/signedUpdates

I can find all the features included in the I-Build in that upate site except the org.eclipse.tm.terminal feature. I am wondering what is the reason for that. Right now, we have a tool to take the zip files and the update site as inputs to generate a P2 build file. Since this feature is not listed, it generates error by running that tool.

Thanks,

Xuan Chen, Problem Determination Tools for IBM i
(905) 413-3769 T/L 313-3769
xuanchen@xxxxxxxxxx

"Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

21/05/2010 10:54 AM

Please respond to
Target Management developer discussions <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"Target Management developer discussions" <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] Inofficial TM 3.2RC1 posted for testing

Xuan,

I believe that the updates are there. I would really like to know how you guess whether a feature is updated or not.
Sine we don't re-tag features all the time, often only the qualifier will change.

Anyways, today's I-build has basically HEAD so everything is surely in there.
And http://download.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm/signedUpdates .

Thanks,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
direct +43.662.457915.85 fax +43.662.457915.6

From: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Xuan Chen
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 4:12 PM
To: Target Management developer discussions
Subject: RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] Inofficial TM 3.2RC1 posted for testing

Hi Martin,

I was expecting some updates for org.eclipse.rse features since the recent TVT fixes should go to this feature. I guess those fix did not go into the RC1 build since they were after the cutoff date of RC1.

I will wait for RC2 driver then.

Thanks,

Xuan Chen, Problem Determination Tools for IBM i
(905) 413-3769 T/L 313-3769
xuanchen@xxxxxxxxxx

"Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

21/05/2010 04:50 AM

Please respond to
Target Management developer discussions <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"Target Management developer discussions" <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] Inofficial TM 3.2RC1 posted for testing

Hi Xuan,

what makes you think so?
My browser correctly shows these three new feature ID's which were changed for the build:

org.eclipse.rse.sdk_3.2.0. : v201005032000-7U7EF9wF8Wz-Sc_Vz0VlT3itVatQ
org.eclipse.tm.terminal.sdk_3.0.100. : v201005032000-7N-FMTC5Oz-3Ts0Yj0_scYJQEJ
org.eclipse.tm.terminal.local_0.1.0. : v201005032000-41A78y8DfD-IA76AB822422

Perhaps your browser is caching stale data?

Thanks,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
direct +43.662.457915.85 fax +43.662.457915.6

From: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Xuan Chen
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 8:04 PM
To: Target Management developer discussions
Subject: Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] Inofficial TM 3.2RC1 posted for testing

Hi Martin,

It seems the update site listed in note below

http://download.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm/updates/3.2interim

still contains the content for M7.

Thanks,

Xuan Chen, Problem Determination Tools for IBM i
(905) 413-3769 T/L 313-3769
xuanchen@xxxxxxxxxx

"Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

20/05/2010 01:36 PM

Please respond to
Target Management developer discussions <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"Target Management developer discussions" <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[dsdp-tm-dev] Inofficial TM 3.2RC1 posted for testing

Hi all,

I have made available an inofficial TM 3.2RC1 for testing:
http://download.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm/downloads/drops/S-3.2RC1-201005200134/
http://download.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm/updates/3.2interim

This build has NOT been contributed to Helios because the majority of the contributions
came in after the RC1 cutoff for Helios, and there was not enough time for reviewing / testing.
That's also why I'm not enlisting this build on our downloads page.

Note that this build starts our RC2 endgame phase according to the
http://wiki.eclipse.org/DSDP/TM/3.2_Ramp_down_Plan

Every commit MUST have a bugzilla associated
There MUST be a 2nd committer's review+ on the bug (may happen after-the-fact if urgent)
Cutoff for committing RC2 contributions is Friday May 21 COB.

Thanks,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
direct +43.662.457915.85 fax +43.662.457915.6 _______________________________________________ dsdp-tm-dev mailing list dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev _______________________________________________ dsdp-tm-dev mailing list dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev _______________________________________________ dsdp-tm-dev mailing list dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev
_______________________________________________ dsdp-tm-dev mailing list dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] Inofficial TM 3.2RC1 posted for testing
  - From: Oberhuber, Martin

References:
- RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] Inofficial TM 3.2RC1 posted for testing
  - From: Oberhuber, Martin

Prev by Date: RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] Inofficial TM 3.2RC1 posted for testing
Next by Date: RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] Inofficial TM 3.2RC1 posted for testing
Previous by thread: RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] Inofficial TM 3.2RC1 posted for testing
Next by thread: RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] Inofficial TM 3.2RC1 posted for testing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs