[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] RE: Should TM 3.1 go on the TM 3.0 update site?
|
I also vote for reusing the 3.0 update site.
____________________________________
David McKnight
Phone: 905-413-3902 , T/L: 969-3902
Internet: dmcknigh@xxxxxxxxxx
Mail: D1/YFY/8200/TOR
____________________________________
Anna <adushistova@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Anna <adushistova@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
13/05/2009 08:16 AM
Please respond to
Target Management developer discussions <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
It sounds reasonable.
I vote for reusing 3.0 update site.
Anna.
> PS
>
> actually, I think that we in TM could even provide a "RSE Remote CDT
> Launcher 3.0 - wrapper to install from CDT" feature that contains an
> updated "rse remote launch" plugin which is empty, and "requires" the
> new CDT variant of the Launcher. This would actually allow people to
> update, and the major version bump to 3.0 would indicate the major
> change.
>
> Does this sound worthwile?
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
> Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
> http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> From: Oberhuber, Martin
> Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Mai 2009 12:14
> To: 'Target Management developer discussions'
> Cc: 'CDT General developers list.'
> Subject: Should TM 3.1 go on the TM 3.0 update site?
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> As we're approaching the release date for TM 3.1, the question
> arises whether we'll want to create a new update site for the
> TM 3.1 contents, or use the existing TM 3.0 update site.
>
> When we use the 3.0 site, then people who have last year's TM
> 3.0 installed can "Check for Updates" in order to get this
> year's 3.1. The EMF update site, for instance, works that way.
>
> If we create a new site, updating automatically is not
> possible but requires manual interaction via "Install New
> Software". This may be desired if we anticipate any kinds of
> breaking changes that we'd rather not have deployed via "Check
> for Updates". The Eclipse Platform, for instance, works that
> way of creating a new site every year.
>
> Note that even the "Automatically check for updates"
> functionality will always allow end users to review their
> updates, so I'm leaning towards re-using the existing 3.0
> site, which currently looks like (attached).
>
> Given that we're in all cases API compatible with 3.0 I don't
> see any issue with updating. The RemoteCDT Launcher is the
> only component I'm aware of that won't update like this since
> it's been moved to the CDT -- it will require manual
> uninstall / reinstall from the CDT if people want to update
> it.
>
> Any thoughts?1
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
> Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
> http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
> dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev
_______________________________________________
dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev


