I’ve already approved all 3 in Bugzilla. After the build and
site population, please watch the Ganymatic for failures. (You already know this.
J)
From:
dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of David Dykstal
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 10:17 PM
To: Target Management developer discussions
Subject: Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] committer heads up - willrequire
votesonsomecriticalfixes
No additional issues, anything else the testing team brings
up will be deferred. I expect no build issues. I will record your vote on these
three (if you have not done so). Thanks!
On Jun 12, 2008, at 8:44 PM, Gaff, Doug wrote:
Ok, I’ve approved all three. I assume you’re code reviewing the
fixes.
I won’t be online tomorrow. I’ll get online at some point over
the weekend (likely Sunday night) and check on the progress.
I don’t think anyone else on the PMC is familiar enough with the
project. Do you expect to find additional issues?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE:
[dsdp-tm-dev] committer heads up - will require
votesonsomecritical fixes
|
Hi guys,
It’s getting late in the afternoon on the East Coast. I’m OOO
Friday and Monday and then traveling.
Dave, what are your plans?
Doug
From: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gaff, Doug
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008
2:21 PM
To: Target Management
developer discussions
Subject: RE: [dsdp-tm-dev]
committer heads up - will require votesonsomecritical fixes
Ok,
Dave, you should represent TM on the cross-projects dev list and
let them know your plans. You will especially need to monitor for problems as
RC5 is built. The dates are here, as I’m sure you know:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Ganymede_Simultaneous_Release
(FYI, I’ll be at the Eclipse board meeting during this time, and
will mostly be offline.)
The planning council seems to have an itchy trigger finger right
now, and I don’t want TM to get booted if there are build or site problems. J
From: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Dykstal
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008
2:16 PM
To: Target Management
developer discussions
Subject: Re: [dsdp-tm-dev]
committer heads up - will require votes onsomecritical fixes
Yes. These all qualify as stop-ship. I am subscribed to the
cross-product-issues-dev. One will be a work-around patch. The others will be
simple low-risk fixes. The work-around is particularly insidious as it hits
particular configurations hard.
I'll send out a bug list shortly.
-- Dave
On Jun 12, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Gaff, Doug wrote:
Hi All,
Since we’re at RC4 now, only stop-shipment bug fixes are
allowed. Does this qualify, or does it make more sense to create a patch
post-Ganymede?
Dave, are you subscribe to the cross-projects-issues-dev mailing
list?
Doug
From: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Dykstal
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008
1:59 PM
To: Target Management
developer discussions
Subject: [dsdp-tm-dev]
committer heads up - will require votes on somecritical fixes
Committers --
There are several high-severity bugs (4 at last count) that we are looking to
fix in RC5 or before. These will require "all available committers"
to review. When these come up, please review them in a timely fashion. Thanks.
_______________________
David Dykstal
david_dykstal@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev
_______________________________________________
dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev
_______________________________________________
dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev
|
