[dsdp-tm-dev] Re: Why are RESID_PROPERTY_FILE_PERMISSIONS_LABEL and simi

[David McKnight <dmcknigh@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I've already made a note of this in
the permissions defect.  I didn't want to fix it there because there
are several other strings that need to move to files.ui from there.  
A separate defect should be opened to handle that.

____________________________________
David McKnight    
Phone:   905-413-3902 , T/L:  969-3902
Internet: dmcknigh@xxxxxxxxxx
Mail:       D1/YFY/8200/TOR
____________________________________

"Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

23/01/2008 05:28 AM

To	David McKnight/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, "David Dykstal" <david_dykstal@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc	"Target Management developer discussions" <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject	Why are RESID_PROPERTY_FILE_PERMISSIONS_LABEL and similar in rse.ui and not in rse.files.ui?

Hi Dave's,

translatable Strings like
   RESID_PROPERTY_FILE_PERMISSIONS_LABEL
are currently declared in the rse.ui plugin.

But these are specific to files only, and actually used in the
rse.files.ui plugin only. An RCP or other RSE product that 
does not want to include files support thus gets these although
it does not need them.

As part of our effort in componentizing and downscaling RSE,
I think that these should be moved to the files.ui plugin
wherever possible.

Or do you see any roadblocks with this?

Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm