[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] [api] RemoteCommandShell should be API
|
ok
____________________________________
David McKnight
Phone: 905-413-3902 , T/L: 969-3902
Internet: dmcknigh@xxxxxxxxxx
Mail: D1/140/8200/TOR
____________________________________
"Oberhuber, Martin"
<Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
31/01/2007 10:22 AM
|
Please respond to
Target Management developer discussions <dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| "David Dykstal" <david_dykstal@xxxxxxxxxx>,
Kushal Munir/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
|
|
cc
| Target Management developer discussions
<dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
Subject
| [dsdp-tm-dev] [api] RemoteCommandShell
should be API |
|
We think that RemoteCommandShell,
which is currently internal, should be API
such that extenders can officially
derive from it when creating their own shell
subsystem.
Note that ServiceCommandShell,
which derives from RemoteCommandShell,
already is API.
Please add notes / discuss on
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=172323
The change should be made when
their is sufficient consensus.
Committers please respond with
"ok"
Thanks,
--
Martin Oberhuber
Wind River Systems, Inc.
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
_______________________________________________
dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev
